Crisis in Kyrgyzstan - the Battle for Central Asia
Today is a day of mourning in Kyrgyzstan with more than 100 people shot dead yesterday and over 1,000 wounded in an uprising against the corrupt and brutal regime brought in under the so called "Tulip Revolution".
These "Revolutions", far from being revolutionary were funded by US backed George Soros, who appears to be a channel for the Project for a New American Century.
After all those deaths, the woman who now claims to be Head of State appears to be another Soros-funded puppet.
On the one hand, an appalling vista of political manipulation, deceit, greed and brutality and on the other, a population not able to tolerate it any longer.
Kyrgyzstan a key linchpin in the new world hegemony blueprint and in NATO’s continuing quest too create a permanent world army has been bloodied. In a swift, unpredictable revolution by it’s citizens which gave the U.S. hegemonic forces no time to react, the President of Kyrgyzstan Baliyev and his regime have been deposed. Bakiyev come into power in the George Soros and U.S. sponsored Tulip revolution. Soros is a Hungarian Jew. Baliyev was well known for such niceties as boiling political dissidents alive. Kyrgyz President Kurmanbek Bakiyev was deposed five years after and in the same manner as he came to power, in a bloody uprising.
Elected president two months after the so-called Tulip Revolution of 2005 he helped engineer, he was since then head of state of the main transit nation for the U.S. and NATO war in Afghanistan.
The Pentagon secured the Manas Air Base (as of last year known as the Transit Center at Manas) in Kyrgyzstan shortly after its invasion of Afghanistan in October of 2001 and in the interim, according to a U.S. armed forces publication last June, “More than 170,000 coalition personnel passed through the base on their way in or out of Afghanistan, and Manas was the transit point for 5,000 tons of cargo, including spare parts and equipment, uniforms and various items to support personnel and mission needs.
“Currently, around 1,000 U.S. troops, along with a few hundred from Spain and France, are assigned to the base.” [1]http://www.sikharchives.com/?p=5144With Roza Otunbayeva as now official head of a new Kyrgyz interim “people’s government,” there is reason to believe that Washington will not be dissatisfied with the overthrow of her former “tulip” partner Bakiyev. She has already confirmed that the American base at Manas will not be closed.
Having earlier served as her nation’s first ambassador to the U.S. and Britain, less than two months after the 2005 coup Otunbayeva, then acting foreign minister, met with her U.S. counterpart Condoleezza Rice in Washington during which the latter assured her that “the U.S. administration will continue to help the Kyrgyz government promote democratic processes in the country.” [13]
Shortly after the March “democratic transformation,” its patron saint, Georgia’s Mikheil Saakashvili, boasted that “Roza Otunbayeva worked in Tbilisi in recent years and was the head of UN office in Abkhazia. During the Rose Revolution she was in Georgia and knew everything that was happening…the Georgian factor was a catalyst of many things going on there [in Kyrgyzstan].”[14]
From the U.S. perspective she appears to have reliable bona fides.
Russia has put its air base in Kyrgyzstan on high alert, though comments from leading Russian government officials – Prime Minister Vladimir Putin in particular – indicate an acceptance of the uprising which has already caused 65 deaths and hundreds of injuries.
NOTE:
Just a note on one-post political spam posters who seem to be taking an interest in this thread.
A lot of real and fake material throwing allegations against one or the other side of this battle is being circulated on the net. Everyone reading here is adult and can judge for themselves, or do a little research, to clear their minds up as to whether any poster's input is a complete fabrication or tallies with the widely-known facts, as recorded by reputable news agencies and by the UN.
The "Bakiyev/Maksim recordings" posted here may or may not be authentic. The reply recordings (not on this site) which suggest that members of the current government, likewise may be fabricated or may be real.
The material is of interest in itself, as was the internet-product at the time of the Iranian election. In my view, it's best viewed with a cold eye and an open mind and examined carefully to see if it is supported by evidence.
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by C Flower
Bookmarks