Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 32

Thread: The Late Debate 24-03-2010

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    15,296

    Default The Late Debate 24-03-2010

    Discussing inter alia, the Anglo pay rises.

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    15,296

    Default Re: The Late Debate 24-03-2010

    Connick & Creighton on the panel.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    1,013

    Default Re: The Late Debate 24-03-2010

    Quote Originally Posted by Baron von Biffo View Post
    Discussing inter alia, the Anglo pay rises.
    As an aside "inter alia", I so hate that phrase.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    15,296

    Default Re: The Late Debate 24-03-2010

    Quote Originally Posted by Rich View Post
    As an aside "inter alia", I so hate that phrase.
    What did it ever do to you?

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    1,975

    Default Re: The Late Debate 24-03-2010

    One expects Creighton to spout her usual guff.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    15,296

    Default Re: The Late Debate 24-03-2010

    Connick expects uo to believe that he doesn't know junior ministers are paid more than back bencher's. Does he think we're thick?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    1,013

    Default Re: The Late Debate 24-03-2010

    Quote Originally Posted by Baron von Biffo View Post
    What did it ever do to you?
    I keep getting letters in work peppered with the phrase, I still don't understand why it is used. I have even googled it a couple of times and you can just say "among other things".

    So, to conclude, inter alia it should be clear that I hate the phrase "inter alia".

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    1,013

    Default Re: The Late Debate 24-03-2010

    Quote Originally Posted by Baron von Biffo View Post
    Connick expects uo to believe that he doesn't know junior ministers are paid more than back bencher's. Does he think we're thick?
    He is a pretty successful businessman down here in New Ross, it might be closer to he may not care.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    15,296

    Default Re: The Late Debate 24-03-2010

    Kinsella is right, keeping people at work should have been the government's priority.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    1,013

    Default Re: The Late Debate 24-03-2010

    Quote Originally Posted by Baron von Biffo View Post
    Kinsella is right, keeping people at work should have been the government's priority.
    Without question. There may be a debate in how it is done, but it has to be priority 1. The actions of the Government do not bode well in this area.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Cork
    Posts
    2,344

    Default Re: The Late Debate 24-03-2010

    Does any financial genius here understand what is meant by " putting in millions " into the banks ? Is it not a case of guarantees rather than real money?

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    15,296

    Default Re: The Late Debate 24-03-2010

    Quote Originally Posted by Rich View Post
    Without question. There may be a debate in how it is done, but it has to be priority 1. The actions of the Government do not bode well in this area.
    The deflationary budget is bringing about the reverse.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    1,013

    Default Re: The Late Debate 24-03-2010

    Quote Originally Posted by Lapsedmethodist View Post
    Does any financial genius here understand what is meant by " putting in millions " into the banks ? Is it not a case of guarantees rather than real money?
    In addition to the guarantee the banks also need to be recapitalised. They do not have the reserves that allow them to start loaning again. In addition the Central Bank/Financial Regulator are tightening the reserve requirements further so they will need even more money to start lending. At this stage many of the banks need 4-6 billion.

    They are also getting money for the loans that they are selling to NAMA. While this is not on the State Balancesheet, it will have to be borrowed by the Government.

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Dublin
    Posts
    1,013

    Default Re: The Late Debate 24-03-2010

    Quote Originally Posted by Baron von Biffo View Post
    The deflationary budget is bringing about the reverse.
    Yep - and the money going into the banks will suck money from the State for many years to come.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Cork
    Posts
    2,344

    Default Re: The Late Debate 24-03-2010

    Quote Originally Posted by Rich View Post
    In addition to the guarantee the banks also need to be recapitalised. They do not have the reserves that allow them to start loaning again. In addition the Central Bank/Financial Regulator are tightening the reserve requirements further so they will need even more money to start lending. At this stage many of the banks need 4-6 billion.

    They are also getting money for the loans that they are selling to NAMA. While this is not on the State Balancesheet, it will have to be borrowed by the Government.
    So why shouldn't people doing this complicated sh*t get a pay rise ?

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •