Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: "Bring Back Our Girls" The Kidnapped Chibok Girls and persecution of Christians in Nigeria.

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Aug 2010

    Default "Bring Back Our Girls" The Kidnapped Chibok Girls and persecution of Christians in Nigeria.

    Last Saturday the Irish Christian organisation "Church in Chains" held their annual conference in Dublin.
    The guest speaker was Rev. Soja Bewarang from Nigeria and he spoke eloquently about the persecution and oppression of Christians in Muslim dominated parts of Nigeria.

    Sharia Law

    The significance of Sharia law (in place in twelve states in northern Nigeria) was detailed by Rev Soja as he explained that under Sharia there is no separation between religion and state and that everything in society is centred around Islam. He said that Christians living under Sharia are forbidden to distribute Christian literature, pray or preach in public and are not free to build churches in Muslim-dominated areas. There are severe penalties for Christians who are deemed to speak out against Islam.

    While Rev Soja warned that Christians everywhere should be concerned about Sharia law, he emphasised that "Jesus tells Christians to loves Muslims because He wants Muslims to join Christians in heaven. Christians in Nigeria do not hate Muslims."

    He spoke about an attempt on his life and of his many murdered colleagues.

    Rev Soja spoke of his own experiences of persecution, telling how he was ambushed after leaving his church headquarters in Jos late one night - his car was hit by shots several times as he drove away to escape the attackers.

    Rev Soja also showed pictures of several pastors from his church who were murdered because of their faith and spoke of the distress of having to conduct their funerals. He also spoke about a suicide bomb attack on his church in Jos: "Lives were lost and the Christian youth of my church were going to retaliate. I had to come and like Moses, stretch out my arms in front of them and say ‘No - this is not our Gospel' and because of the respect that the youth had for me, they listened to me."
    He spoke of the 276 school girls kidnapped from their school in Chibok on 14th April 2014 by Boko Haram. 57 girls have managed to escape but 218 are still being held captive.
    Unfortunately forced marriage (aka rape) plus over two years of indoctrination and Stockholm Syndrome have made matters worse.

    "It is a puzzle that has left more questions than answers. We cannot understand why soldiers who are searching for the girls have not allowed parents of the girls to accompany them to help identify the girls. We had thought that with the release of Amina [who was found in May 2016] she would be able to lead the military to find the girls but Amina herself is not helping matters; she keeps saying that she just wants to be with her husband [a Boko Haram fighter to whom she was forcibly married]. The majority of the girls are Christian and pastors in my church know some of their parents."
    The parents of the Chibok Girls have mounted a vigorous campaign for their safe return.

    It is shameful that their plight has not received more international coverage.

    Here is a link to the english language bring back our girls web site.

    And here is a link to the Church in Chains conference report and their web site:

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2010

    Default Re: "Bring Back Our Girls" The Kidnapped Chibok Girls and persecution of Christians in Nigeria.

    Efforts to free the girls have been complicated by splits in the Boko Haram organisation, last minute changes in demands from them and people fraudulently pretending to speak on their behalf.

    From Church in Chains. Click on link for an easier to read version of below:

    19th September, 2016
    Nigeria's Information Minister says negotiations for a prisoner swap almost led to the rescue of the Chibok schoolgirls in 2015, but three times the negotiations collapsed.

    On Friday 16 September, Minister of Information Lai Mohammed gave an update on the government's efforts to rescue the Chibok schoolgirls (see full statement below). He stated that President Muhammadu Buhari is prepared to swap Boko Haram prisoners for the girls, and that last year the government almost secured their release, but three times the negotiations collapsed. On the first occasion, in August 2015, terrorist prisoners were taken to Maiduguri for a swap, but at the last minute Boko Haram issued a new set of demands that had not been part of the extensive negotiations, and the process stalled. He also explained that the recent leadership battle within Boko Haram has been a major setback to the negotiations.

    In an interview with the Guardian, Lai Mohammed said the government is now sure it is negotiating with the right people. He said the previous government under President Goodluck Jonathan conducted high-level negotiations before realising that they were talking to "charlatans", and added that negotiations under President Jonathan did not start until a year after the girls were abducted, making it more difficult for President Buhari.

    He said, "We are confident that we have a grasp of the divisions in the group, so when there have been setbacks in the negotiations we have known why. We can't put any sort of time on [their release]. The thing is we are dealing with a group that can change the goalposts at any time. It is and has been a really tricky situation. It's been a very testy matter because these divisions in Boko Haram are constantly shifting. But we inherited this situation and we are concentrating on rescuing the girls."

    The #BringBackOurGirls campaign group welcomed the news that the government has been negotiating with Boko Haram. Spokesman Abdulahi Abubakar said, "This is what we have been asking the government to do all this time. But we would not be part of the negotiation, the government should go ahead with the process, we welcome it and would continue to monitor developments."

    Oby Ezekwisili, founder of the group, said: "Our movement has been asking for feedback on our government's rescue efforts since our last meeting of 14 January 2016. So we consider this briefing by the federal government a start. We welcome every factual communication of their effort to bring back our girls and hope that this signals a new period of continuous feedback to parents, our movement and the general public."

    However, one of the fathers, Yakub Bulus, said: "I don't believe the government is making any efforts to rescue our girls. I will only believe it when I see our girls. Since 2014, when our girls were taken, it has been the same promises and assurance without results, so what the minister says is not true, they are not doing anything."

    His wife, Esther, dismissed the Information Minister's statement as "the usual lies" and added, "The last time they were here they gave out money to parents of school kids who have being attacked or taken by Boko Haram. I don't need money, all I need is my daughter."

    Information Minister Lai Mohammed's statement
    Good afternoon, gentlemen of the press.

    Members of the public may recall that when the present administration came on board, Mr President pledged to Nigerians to ensure the security of lives and property of every Nigerian, provide employment for the nation's teeming youths and fight corruption. Since that time, the security agencies have been saddled with the responsibility of dealing with the threat of terrorism which has ravaged most parts of the Northern region.

    You will also recall that from the physical destruction of communities and strategic institutions, the terrorist elements also engaged in abduction of women and children in the affected parts. Most painful was the abduction of the school girls in Chibok at the twilight of the past administration in 2014. When Mr President assumed leadership of this country, he immediately directed security agencies to urgently fashion out strategies to trace, locate and ensure the safe and successful release of the Chibok girls. This was the mandate given to security agencies.

    Gentlemen, it was consequent upon this directive that the security agencies, comprising of the Nigerian Army, Air Force, Navy, Police and the DSS [Department of State Services], commenced action in June 2015. To this effect also, the DSS established a special tactical unit to review the gamut of actions so far carried out to secure the release of the Chibok girls, establish why the action has recorded no success as it were and to present a roadmap for possible success.

    In this process, the DSS and the other security agencies observed the following:

    Many persons or groups posing as negotiators actually had no veritable intelligence nor the reach to facilitate the release of the Chibok girls;

    The efforts were clouded by persons with very partisan interests and whose main objective was solely to score cheap political points. It was obvious their approach had no relevance to the release of the girls;

    Some informants or persons volunteering to be negotiators or facilitators saw and treated the girls' fate and indeed the situation as a conduit to enrich themselves, thus making the whole thing a pecuniary venture; and

    As a result of the conflicting and partisan interests, issues were muddled up to the extent that reasonable and fruitful leads either failed or simply came too late for any useful action.

    It was therefore found that in the midst of these strong competing interests and unnecessary rivalries, nothing was achieved before the 2015 handover date. It was based on these that the security agencies set out to work for the release of the girls.

    First, there was the need to identify those with relevant intelligence on the groups holding the girls, as well as establish sources of contact in touch with the group. This exercise was found not to be an easy task. On those holding the Chibok girls, there was also a high level of mistrust, as they too found many approaches or groups claiming to be in touch with them as false or unreliable.

    In this new bid, many offers ranging from credible, not credible to outright off-mark information came to the Government. Some international bodies and countries also provided leads. It was out of this that relevant security agencies were able to strike a chord. By the third week of July 2015, a contact group was in touch with credible assets who had the reach, and who attested to the fact that some of the Chibok girls were alive. Mr President was then briefed of these assets and intelligence and he gave his assent for further negotiations on the Chibok girls.

    Precisely on 17th July 2015, the DSS opened negotiations process with the group holding the Chibok girls. However, in return for the release of some of these girls, the group also made some demands. These included the release of some of their fighters arrested including some involved in major terrorist actions, resulting in several fatalities, and others who were experts in manufacture of locally assembled explosives. This was difficult to accept, but appropriate security agencies had to again inform Mr President of these demands, and its viewed implications. Again Mr President gave his assent believing that the overall release of these girls remains paramount and sacrosanct.

    Meanwhile, following the above development, Government and the security agencies had sufficient leverage to work out the modalities of the swap. These included creating the safe haven, or necessary place of swap and working out the logistic details. Based on this, the DSS availed other critical sister agencies of this new situation. Immediately, the Nigerian Army and the Air Force sent some specialists to commence a detailed arrangement for the swap. This was during the last week of July 2015 and 1st week of August 2015. The officers representing the various agencies worked out the logistic details, such as the number of persons to be swapped i.e. number of girls and detainees to be exchanged, the vehicles and aircraft, as well as safeguards, i.e. safety of the persons, including the location of the swap.

    When it was finally agreed by all parties, Mr President was again informed that the preparations were concluded, and the first step for the swap would commence on 1st August 2015. Mr President robustly gave his approval.

    On 4th August 2015, the persons who were to be part of the swap arrangements and all others involved in the operation were transported to Maiduguri, Borno State. This team, with the lead facilitator, continued the contact with the group holding the Chibok girls. The Service was able to further prove to the group its sincerity, as it established communication contact between it and its detained members. All things were in place for the swap which was mutually agreed. Expectations were high. Unfortunately, after more than two weeks of negotiation and bargains, the group, just at the dying moments, issued a new set of demands, never bargained for or discussed by the group before the movement to Maiduguri. All this while, the security agencies waited patiently. This development stalled what would have been the first release process of the Chibok girls.

    It may be important to note that in spite of this setback, the government and the security agencies have not relented in the bid to ensure that the Chibok girls are released safely. By the month of November, precisely 13th November 2015, another fresh negotiation process with the group was initiated. This time, there was the need to discuss a fresh component in other to avoid issues that had stalled the former arrangement. There were however some problems that many may not discern, but should be expected in this kind of situation. Some critical persons within the group who played such vital role in August 2015 were discovered to be dead during combat action or as a result of the emerging rift amongst members of the group then. These two factors delayed the process. In spite of these, negotiation continued on new modalities.

    By 30th November 2015 it was becoming glaring that the division amongst the group was more profound. This affected the swap process. By 10th December 2015, another negotiation process was in place, but this failed to achieve results because of the varying demands by the group.

    Gentlemen of the press, the security agencies since the beginning of 2016 have not only remained committed but have also taken the lead to resolve the Chibok girls' issue. In spite of the current division amongst members of the terrorist group, which has seriously affected efforts to release the girls, renewed efforts have commenced using our trusted assets and facilitators. However, this job requires diligence and ability to deal with a group that can easily change its demands without notice.

    Officers and men have sacrificed their time and energy, and some have already paid the supreme price since the abduction of the Chibok girls, fighting for the safe release of the girls. Many friendly countries and organisations have equally been very forthcoming in providing their human and technological resources to assist in the process. They are still doing so. We cannot as a nation ignore these sacrifices.

    The Government and its security agencies remain committed to ensuring that the Chibok girls are safely released in fulfillment of the Presidential mandate. Let me emphasise that Government appreciates the resilience of Nigerians in the fight against insurgency and terrorism, and will continue to call on fellow Nigerians to hold that much is ahead and therefore support Mr President's resolve on this matter. I cannot end this without appealing to the parents and relatives of the Chibok girls. We are with you; we feel your pains and shall not relent until we succeed in bringing home our girls and every other citizen abducted by the group. It is important to appeal to all those who have shown concern in resolving this matter to continue to trust the efforts of Government to deal with the situation.

    Thank you.

    (Guardian, Naija, Omojuwa)

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Aug 2010

    Default Re: "Bring Back Our Girls" The Kidnapped Chibok Girls and persecution of Christians in Nigeria.

    I am surprised the Irish charity "Church in Chains" is not better known. The salary of their CEO is available on their web site and is very modest compared to other NGO's.
    There were I recon about 200 people at their annual conference, but no press coverage as far as I know. Maybe they don't seek publicity, but I do not see why they should not.

    An edited version of Rev. Soja's talk has been put on youtube.


  4. #4
    Join Date
    Aug 2010

    Default Re: "Bring Back Our Girls" The Kidnapped Chibok Girls and persecution of Christians in Nigeria.

    The Nigerian government with the help of the Swiss government has negotiated the release of twenty one of the kidnapped Chibok girls. Many thousands of women have been taken captive by Boko Haram over the last few years.

    "Yesterday, twenty one of the abducted Chibok schoolgirls were released following negotiations between the Nigerian government and Boko Haram (the Islamist terrorist group that abducted them in April 2014).

    Vice President Osinbajo described the girls as being in "reasonably good health considering the circumstances they've been held in". He said the government would provide accommodation, support and healthcare for the girls and that their parents would soon join them. He also announced that the government had decided to sponsor the girls' education and provide them with jobs."
    Church in chains.

    More detailed account here:

    Al Jazeera report on the release:

    http://<a href="http://www.aljazeera...46662.html</a>

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Aug 2010

    Default Re: "Bring Back Our Girls" The Kidnapped Chibok Girls and persecution of Christians in Nigeria.

    Quote Originally Posted by church in chains
    Released Chibok girls
    reunited with families

    The 21 Chibok schoolgirls released by Boko Haram last week were reunited with their families at a thanksgiving service on Sunday. At the service, the girls held up Bibles to signify their freedom of worship, having been forced to convert to Islam by their kidnappers.

    Gloria Dame, one of the rescued girls, said: "I did not know that a day like this would come when we would be dancing and giving thanks to God among people... We are praying to God for the release of our remaining ones in captivity."

    The released girls face many problems including discrimination simply because they were in contact with Boko Haram. If that is true it seems awful that they would be re-victimised by their own neighbors.

    Community leader Pogu Bitrus, chairman of the Chibok Development Association, says more than a third of the students abducted seem unwilling to leave their captors. He says they may have been radicalised or else fear that because they were forced to marry extremists and have children they will be labelled "Boko Haram wives".

    He said the released girls should be educated abroad, explaining: "We would prefer that they are taken away from the community and this country because the stigmatisation is going to affect them for the rest of their lives. Even someone believed to have been abused by Boko Haram would be seen in a bad light." He said girls who escaped during the raid in 2014 faced taunts and insults in Chibok and were labelled "Boko Haram wives", and added that at least twenty of them are being educated in the US.

    The likelihood of stigmatisation was confirmed by Mausi Segun, a researcher in Nigeria for Human Rights Watch, who said many of the girls who escaped during the raid had to leave Chibok because they were seen as Boko Haram wives even though they never got as far as the Boko Haram camp: "Some never even went back to Chibok and some left very shortly after returning." Regarding the released girls, Mausi Segun said it was unlikely they would be able to return to Chibok, saying: "Any sign that there has been sexual contact with any man, and these men are Boko Haram, will cause a backlash. The likelihood they will return home is slim."

    Thousands of women have been abducted by Boko Haram in recent years, and those who have been released or have escaped have faced discrimination and stigma.

    197 girls are still missing. It is believed at least six have died in captivity.

    Of the 276 Chibok schoolgirls kidnapped in April 2014, 57 escaped by jumping from the trucks taking them away. One girl (Amina Ali) was found and rescued in May 2016 link, and 21 were released on 13 October. This leaves 197 girls still missing, and it is feared that several of them are dead – Amina Ali reported that six had died in captivity. Of a group of about one hundred girls held together, one died of a snake bite, one died in childbirth and four died in a bombing.
    At least 14 parents have died since their daughters were kidnapped. One father was murdered by Boko Haram when they raided his village.

    Full report here:

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Aug 2010

    Default Re: "Bring Back Our Girls" The Kidnapped Chibok Girls and persecution of Christians in Nigeria.

    NIGERIA: Twelve Christians killed in Easter attack:

    At least twelve people were killed and many more injured when Fulani militants attacked Asso village in southern Kaduna State on Easter Saturday (15 April).

    Eyewitnesses reported that a large number of heavily armed militants descended on the village at around 7pm, attacking villagers as they attended Easter Vigil services.

    The attack on Asso occurred despite the heavy security presence in southern Kaduna. According to local sources, the majority of police and soldiers who were deployed to Asso in December 2016 in response to ongoing attacks in the area were withdrawn on Good Friday (the day before the attack), with the exception of four police who were easily overwhelmed by the attackers. As the violence continued, more soldiers and police arrived, but they too were outnumbered and obliged to take cover along with fleeing villagers.

    Most of the victims were Roman Catholics and the local Catholic bishop, Joseph Danlami Bagobiri of Kafanchan, along with the priest in Asso, Fr Alexander Yayock, presided over the burial of ten Catholics on Easter Day.

    bishop-bagobiriBishop Bagobiri (pictured) issued a strong statement in the aftermath of the attack in which he accused the local governor, Nasir Ahmad El-Rufai, of complicity with the perpetrators of the violence and bias against their victims. In the statement, he said: “The attitude of the state government has been marred by lots of complicity and bias which exacerbated rather than ameliorated tensions… The Governor has used the state apparatus to insult, denigrate, intimidate, arrest and put in prison all voices of reason from Southern Kaduna who dare to challenge his handling of this crisis… The primary responsibility of government as enshrined in the constitution is the protection of life and property of citizens irrespective of ethnic and/or religious persuasion. Any breach of this fundamental principle of social contract contravenes the very reason for which Government exists. Unfortunately, our government both at the Federal and State levels has failed woefully in this regard because of its inability to rise above ethnic and religious bias.

    “The killings with impunity in Southern Kaduna must not be allowed to continue. And Government in the State has a special and irreplaceable role in bringing this scourge to an end. The current Government in the State must follow the example of past Governments by initiating measures that would unify rather than divide the people of the State on ethnic and religious lines as this Government has been doing since its inception.”

    For over a year, southern Kaduna State has been the main focus of the Fulani militia campaign, with four of its eight Local Government Areas suffering regular massacres that have claimed at least 800 lives. The Kaduna State Government eventually deployed troops and police to the area in December 2016 to address the violence, but the killings have continued, with villagers also targeted as they tend their fields.

    Who are the Fulani?

    Fulani-ArmedThe Fulani are regarded as the world’s largest nomadic group: about 20 million people dispersed across Western Africa. In Nigeria, the Fulani comprise “the most populous and politically influential of more than 250 ethnic groups in the country. Nigeria’s president, Muhammadu Buhari, is ethnic Fulani.

    The centuries-old Fulani heritage is pastoral, organised primarily around nomadic herding of cattle, sheep and goats, though some Fulani farm crops or live in urban areas. The Fulani are predominantly Muslim.

    As the frontier of the Sahara Desert has moved southward, Fulani herds have gradually been pushed southward toward Nigeria’s “Middle Belt,” a handful of states straddling the pre-colonial line dividing Nigeria’s predominantly Muslim north from its Christian south. The Middle Belt is a farming region, and the advancing Fulani-owned herds have increasingly encroached on croplands.

    The resulting conflicts over land have taken on an ethnic and religious character, as many of the farmers of Nigeria’s Middle Belt are ethnic Berom, an indigenous people who are predominantly Christian. Armed Fulani have planned and executed operations that have killed and chased away thousands of Christians.

    The 2015 Global Terrorism Index described Fulani militants as the fourth deadliest terrorist organisation in the world.

    (Christian Solidarity Worldwide,World Watch Monitor

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Aug 2010

    Default Re: "Bring Back Our Girls" The Kidnapped Chibok Girls and persecution of Christians in Nigeria.

    Good news. 82 of the kidnapped Chibok girls have been released today (7/5/17)and are now safe.

    Boko Haram militants have released 82 schoolgirls out of a group of more than 200 whom they kidnapped from the northeastern town of Chibok three years ago in exchange for prisoners, the presidency said on Saturday.

    Around 270 girls were kidnapped in April 2014 by the Islamist militant group, which has killed 15,000 people and displaced more than two million during a seven-year insurgency aimed at creating an Islamic caliphate in northeastern Nigeria.

    Dozens escaped in the initial melee, but more than 200 remained missing for more than two years.

    Nigeria thanked Switzerland and the International Committee of the Red Cross for helping secure the release of the 82 girls after "lengthy negotiations", the presidency said in a statement.

    President Muhammadu Buhari will receive the girls on Sunday afternoon in the capital Abuja, it said, without saying how many Boko Haram suspects had been exchanged or disclosing other details.
    From here:

    Great work by all involved especially the Nigerian government. This development and the work and campaigning of the #Bringbackourgirls campaign reflects the very best of Nigeria and its people.

    The Bring back our girls campaign states that there are still 113 girls being held captive by the Islamic Boko Haram.

    There are also another estimated 1,500 other, mostly Christian, people of all ages been held captive by Boko Haram.
    Their relatives fear they will be forgotten because of the publicity rightly given to the Chibok girls.

    Here is a link to the Bring Back Our Girls site:

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Aug 2010

    Default Re: "Bring Back Our Girls" The Kidnapped Chibok Girls and persecution of Christians in Nigeria.

    Report from Church in Chains about the released girls:

    The Bring Back Our Girls campaign welcomed the releases and commended the government for its action but also stated that the freed girls require rehabilitation and trauma counselling. “It’s not just to bring them back home, we must ensure that they get the education they are supposed to have…it is time for them to be reunited with their families. Psychosocial therapy… there has to be rehabilitation. And at the end of the day, we want to have world leaders out of every one of them so that they can be what the terrorists did not want them to be.”

    It is unclear what will happen to the 82 young women. Some 21 others who were released in October 2016 are still being kept in Abuja, ostensibly for counselling and have not been allowed to go back and live with their families, who live 800 km away in Chibok. Concerns have been expressed that the government is reluctant to allow them freedom because it doesn’t want details of their treatment by Boko Haram to become known.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2010

    Default Re: "Bring Back Our Girls" The Kidnapped Chibok Girls and persecution of Christians in Nigeria.

    Many of the freed Chibok girls, now young women, are enrolled in a a pre-university course organised by the Nigerian government. Others are afraid to attend because Boko Haram have been active in the area where the school is situated.

    Over 100 of the Chibok girls are still being held by Boko Haram as well as well over 1,000 other people whose plight receives little attention.

    More than 100 “Chibok girls” freed from Boko Haram in the past year have been reunited with their families and resumed their education.

    The young women (pictured at a government-organised celebration earlier this month), now aged between 19 and 21, were part of the group of 276 girls (predominantly Christian) kidnapped from Government Girls Secondary School in Chibok, Borno state, in April 2014.

    Twenty one were released in October 2016 and 82 were freed in May 2107. Since their release, they have been in government custody undergoing rehabilitation therapy.

    aisha-alhassanThe Nigerian Women Affairs Minister Aisha Alhassan (pictured) says they are now “fully recovered” and they were handed over to their parents at a party in the capital Abuja earlier this month.

    Ms Alhassan said: “They are going to be in one of the best schools, the American University of Nigeria [located in Yola, Adamawa State in the northeast of the country], where they will start a special foundation programme like a pre-degree.

    “It’s a very happy day. When the girls came out, they were so traumatised that they didn’t even believe they were free. They are fully recovered, and they are very anxious to go to school.”

    However, some sources have said that some of the young women were opposed to going to the school because Boko Haram has carried out recent attacks in part of Adamawa state. One source said, “Many of the girls have expressed fear that they could be abducted for a second time. Yet, they are afraid to go against the decision of the minister to enroll them.” It was reported that one of the young women attempted suicide earlier this month because of her fears.

    More than 100 of the schoolgirls kidnapped from Chibok remain in Boko Haram captivity but Ms Alhassan said negotiations with the militants are ongoing to secure their release. “The good news is that very soon I assure you that by the grace of God we will have our remaining girls released. That is to say negotiation is still on and we will see light at the end of tunnel and very soon we will have our remaining daughters back,” she said.
    Above is from Church in Chains, an Irish organisation working for persecuted Christians.

    They also reported this massacre, which, maybe I missed it, but I did not see reported anywhere else:

    Muslim Fulani herdsmen massacred twenty Christians as they slept on Friday 8 September in a village in central Plateau state.
    More on the massacre:

    Muslim Fulani herdsmen in central Nigeria’s Plateau state massacred twenty Christians as they slept just after midnight on Friday 8 September in Ancha village, Miango District, in Bassa Local Government Area.

    Sati Ishaya (pictured) was one of those killed – nine were children, ranging in age from 3 months to 17 years. The dead included 19 Baptists and one Methodist, and came from three of Ancha’s fifty households – one family lost all its members.

    Police said the massacre was a reprisal attack following the discovery of the beheaded body of a Fulani boy from Ancha. However, a Christian from Ancha told Morning Star News that local residents cannot understand why they were targeted, as the Fulani boy was murdered in another village.

    “The village where they claim one of them was killed is not part of our village, and we have never had any misunderstanding with them in the past,” said John Bulus, secretary of Salama Baptist Church-Ancha, which lost 19 members.

    US-based advocacy group International Christian Concern reported that the Fulani boy was killed in Hukkie village, 15 km away from Ancho, where he was caught up in a clash between Hukkie farmers and herdsmen who let their cattle graze on the farms and destroy crops. The farmers confronted the herdsmen, who started a fight.


    John Bulus was woken by the sound of gunshots shortly after midnight on 8 September and hurried outside, to see three people holding guns. They shot at him but missed and he ran indoors. “I heard sporadic gun shots all over the village,” he said. “They were shooting everywhere in the village and this lasted for about 25 minutes.”

    He said the attackers were talking to each other in the Fulani language, and in the light of a bright moon he was able to recognise some of them as local Fulanis. However, villagers believe the herdsmen were accompanied by Islamic extremist militants.

    About five minutes after the shooting stopped, the attackers gathered outside the village and left. Bulus and others went from house to house and found twenty people dead and six others seriously injured.

    Plateau Commissioner of Police Peter Ogunyanwo told reporters that the murdered Fulani boy from Ancha had been reported missing on 3 August and his body was found on 5 September, three days before the massacre. He said, “We are investigating the matter, but from our findings so far, the attack was carried out by Fulani herdsmen to avenge the killing of a young boy.” He added that five suspects had been arrested over the missing Fulani boy, but that no one had been detained over the Ancha massacre.

    Fulani violence in Nigeria’s Middle Belt

    Nigeria’s Middle Belt has seen much violence over the years as Muslim Fulani herdsmen compete with Christian farmers for fertile grazing land, often justifying their attacks with claims of cattle rustling by settled farmers. In recent years, thousands of Christians have been killed and their properties looted and burned, including hundreds of church buildings.

    Long-running conflict has worsened, and it is suspected that the herdsmen have links with Boko Haram. The pattern of violence in the region – the use of military-grade weapons to drive Christians off the land, the destruction of Christian homes and churches and the call for the imposition of Sharia law – is now being seen as ethnic cleansing of the Middle Belt. President Muhammadu Buhari, who is a Fulani, ordered a crackdown on the herdsmen, but attacks continue.

    According to International Christian Concern, between October 2016 and September 2017 Fulani militants attacked over twenty Christian villages, destroyed hundreds of Christian properties and killed over two hundred Christians.

    International Criminal Court investigates armed Fulani attacks

    theicc_galloimagesThe International Criminal Court (ICC) at The Hague in the Netherlands has begun investigating Fulani attacks on communities across Nigeria. The Human Rights Writers Association of Nigeria (HURIWA) sent a petition, Unlawful Homicide under Nigerian Laws and the Obligation of the Nigerian State to Enforce the Laws, dated 15 September 2016, asking the ICC “to investigate the incessant killings of farmers by armed Fulani herdsmen and the suspected support the Nigerian government provides for these killings to continue” and asking the ICC to take action to bring the perpetrators to international justice.

    HURIWA said it received notification of the investigation in a letter from the ICC dated 15 August 2017, which noted, “It appears that your communication relates to a situation already under preliminary examination by the office of the prosecutor… Under Article 53 of the Rome Statue, the prosecutor must consider whether there is a reasonable basis to believe that crimes within jurisdiction of the court have been committed, the gravity of the crimes, whether national systems are investigating and prosecuting the relevant crimes, and the interest of justice… As soon as a decision is taken on whether there is a reasonable basis to proceed with an investigation, we will advise you promptly.”

    International Crisis Group criticises government response to violence

    On 19 September, the International Crisis Group (ICG) published a report, “Herders against Farmers: Nigeria’s Expanding Deadly Conflict”, in which it says the response to Nigeria’s Middle Belt crisis has been poor at federal and state levels. The ICG is a transnational NGO that carries out field research on violent conflict and advocates policies in response.

    Explaining the background to the crisis, the report states, “Propelled by desertification, insecurity and the loss of grazing land to expanding settlements, the southward migration of Nigeria’s herders is causing violent competition over land with local farmers. To prevent the crisis from escalating, the government should strengthen security for herders and farmers, implement conflict resolution mechanisms and establish grazing reserves.”

    Among its criticisms of the government’s response, the ICG report states that it “typically deploys the federally controlled police, and sometimes the army, to areas reporting attacks or clashes. These forces, poorly deployed in rural areas, often lack logistics for rapid response, especially across difficult terrain.” The report also states that there has been “feeble” judicial action: “Police occasionally arrest and prosecute both herders and vigilantes bearing firearms, but relatively few perpetrators of violence face justice. Impunity has encouraged actors to take matters into their own hands.”

    The report points out that Middle Belt violence has escalated in recent years, stating: “With an estimated death toll of approximately 2,500 people in 2016, these clashes are becoming as potentially dangerous as the Boko Haram insurgency in the north east.”
    Last edited by eamo; 15-12-2017 at 08:54 PM. Reason: more information

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Aug 2010

    Default Re: "Bring Back Our Girls" The Kidnapped Chibok Girls and persecution of Christians in Nigeria.

    Another of the Chibok girls has been rescued by the Nigerian army. It is good news and gives hope that the remaining 112 girls along with the very many other children, women and men been held by Boko Haram will be freed.

    On 4 January, the Nigerian Army announced that it had rescued Salomi Pogu, one of the Chibok schoolgirls abducted by the radical Islamic group Boko Haram in 2014.

    The army stated that troops engaged in “Operation Lafiya Dole” (targeting the activities of Boko Haram) had found Salomi in Pulka, in the Sambisa Forest region of the north-eastern state of Borno. According to the army, Salomi was found along with another girl, aged 14 (not part of the Chibok group), who was carrying a baby. The army did not disclose further details of the rescue other than to state that the three were in “the safe custody of troops and receiving medical attention”.

    The rescue was confirmed the following day by the chairman of the Chibok Parents Forum, Yakubu Nkeki, who said with a tone of excitement, “It is true! Her name is Salome Pogu, from Kuburmbula Ward, Kaumitihyahi village.” He added, “Just the day before, her father, Pogu Yahi, came to visit me and asked what further steps were being taken to secure the release of the remaining girls, only for us to hear the good news of the rescue of his daughter today.“

    Yakubu also said that the previously released girls who had been in the custody of the Nigerian government in Abuja were brought to spend Christmas with their families in Chibok. He said, “We distributed them to their parents in the various villages. It was indeed a joyful time of reunion and celebration.“

    bbog-march-to-villaThe Bring Back Our Girls movement also confirmed the news to be true and said that Salomi is Number 15 on the publicly known list of missing Chibok girls. It stated that 112 schoolgirls remain missing. The movement, which has campaigned tirelessly to ensure that the Chibok girls would not be forgotten, will hold its monthly “March to the Villa” to the official residence of the Nigerian President on Tuesday 23 January.

    The Chibok girls, now aged between 19 and 21, were a group of over 200 girls (predominantly Christian) kidnapped from Government Girls Secondary School in Chibok, Borno state, by Boko Haram terrorists in April 2014. Twenty-one were released in October 2016 and 82 were freed in May 2017. The released girls spent a long time in government custody undergoing rehabilitation therapy before resuming education in September 2017.

    (Bring Back Our Girls/International Christian Concern/Premium Times)
    From here:

    and more news from Church in Chains:

Tags for this Thread


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
Share us
Follow Us