Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Trouble in Quebec, Separatists Elected

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Wash DC
    Posts
    4,495

    Default Trouble in Quebec, Separatists Elected

    Thought Sam Lord would have gotten here already. I’ll get it started.

    Big surprise in Canada this week with the election of the separatist Parti Quebecois (PQ).
    While the leader Pauline Marois was giving her victory speech a gunman opened fire outside the hall killing one and injuring one. As he was wrestled to the ground he shouted (in French) that the English are rising or somesuch.
    Looks like interesting times ahead in Canada. Here are a couple of pieces.

    While Americans were turning toward Charlotte on Tuesday night, Canadians from Bonavista to Vancouver Island were coming to the weary realization that they once again must deal with a separatist government in Quebec. For the first time in nine years, voters in the province elected into power the separatist Parti Quebecois and its leader, Pauline Marois, who will become the first female premier in the province's history. During the campaign, Marois promised repeatedly to implement what she calls "sovereignist governance," a plan to goad the federal government into transferring more power into provincial hands.

    For most Canadians, and for most Americans who treasure Canada, this is the bad news. Any and every separatist government in Quebec raises the specter of another bruising battle with federalists over the shape and nature of the Canadian nation. And, to many Canadians, the very idea of a separatist government in Quebec kindles dire memories of a 20-year period, from 1975 to 1995, when it appeared that Canada itself really would split asunder. The 1995 referendum on sovereignty was barely defeated by a vote of 49.42 percent to 50.58 percent. It was that close -- and that was when the great federalist himself, Pierre Elliot Trudeau, was still alive and kicking.

    But 2012 is not 1995 or 1980 or 1976, all years of previous independence referendums. Even though Marois hasn't ruled out another referendum on Quebec's sovereignty, Canada does not seemed to have freaked out about the separatist victory. The Toronto Stock Exchange was actually up in early trading on Wednesday, and it's easy to understand why. A handful of factors suggest that, at least for the moment, the PQ victory doesn't necessarily presage another cycle of vicious political fighting over the territorial future of America's favorite neighbor, the second largest country in the world. Here's why:
    http://www.theatlantic.com/internati...atists/261994/

    Some more to get up to speed.

    http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/...13d335ac5fbae5

    http://www.thestar.com/news/insight/...pauline-marois
    As a general rule the most successful man in life is the man who has the best information. Benjamin Disraeli
    Secrecy is for losers. For people who do not know how important the information really is.
    Daniel Patrick Moynihan - Secrecy: The American Experience (1998)

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    10,518

    Default Re: Trouble in Quebec, Separatists Elected

    Quote Originally Posted by Count Bobulescu View Post
    Thought Sam Lord would have gotten here already. I’ll get it started.
    Journalists are always looking for a story but I don't think there is one here. As the writer eventually gets around to conceding in the last paragraph, the election of the PQ does not have any particular implications at this point in time.
    A time between ashes and roses is coming
    When everything shall be extinguished
    When everything shall begin

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Wash DC
    Posts
    4,495

    Default Re: Trouble in Quebec, Separatists Elected

    Quote Originally Posted by Sam Lord View Post
    Journalists are always looking for a story but I don't think there is one here. As the writer eventually gets around to conceding in the last paragraph, the election of the PQ does not have any particular implications at this point in time.
    Actually, all five of the points he made were in furtherance of the view that it’s no big deal, but that’s no reason to deny people on PW the opportunity to fight about it.
    As a general rule the most successful man in life is the man who has the best information. Benjamin Disraeli
    Secrecy is for losers. For people who do not know how important the information really is.
    Daniel Patrick Moynihan - Secrecy: The American Experience (1998)

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •