Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 45 of 45

Thread: "I am extremely likely to cut the number of councillors and local authorities" Hogan / FG on local government changes

  1. #31
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    15,269

    Default Re: "I am extremely likely to cut the number of councillors and local authorities" Hogan / FG on local government changes

    Quote Originally Posted by bernadette View Post
    MPB is right broadening the constituency would lesson the chances of people like Lowry getting elected.

    The constitution needs to be tightened so that those proven like Wallace who incur huge debts or others who are proven to be dishonest cannot stand for election.

    The country is also changing dramatically and that will increase the chances of independent applicants.
    Trying to engineer the electoral system to ensure that candidates you don't approve of can't be elected probably isn't the highest expression of democracy.

  2. #32
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    1,221

    Default Re: "I am extremely likely to cut the number of councillors and local authorities" Hogan / FG on local government changes

    Quote Originally Posted by Baron von Biffo View Post
    Trying to engineer the electoral system to ensure that candidates you don't approve of can't be elected probably isn't the highest expression of democracy.
    What?? Its a question of ensuring the correct number of representatives for the population and ensuring those representatives are honest and worthy of the peoples trust...It may be that the best way to ensure that is to widen the net.

  3. #33
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    954

    Default Re: "I am extremely likely to cut the number of councillors and local authorities" Hogan / FG on local government changes

    Quote Originally Posted by Baron von Biffo View Post
    Trying to engineer the electoral system to ensure that candidates you don't approve of can't be elected probably isn't the highest expression of democracy.
    Nonsense.

    Nobody is advocating engineering the electoral system to control who runs for election.

    I am advocating for an electoral system that insures a fairer way of electing our representitives.

    Nobody is advocating for preventing people running for election.

    What I am advocating is that these politicians cannot buy their election, even when they have been proven to have abused their position and acted in a corrupt manner.

    If we are not prepared to prevent people the judiciary believe to have been corrupt, from running for office, we have to create a system that makes it a true election, based on who the majority believe is the best candidate for the job.

  4. #34
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    15,269

    Default Re: "I am extremely likely to cut the number of councillors and local authorities" Hogan / FG on local government changes

    Quote Originally Posted by bernadette View Post
    What?? Its a question of ensuring the correct number of representatives for the population and ensuring those representatives are honest and worthy of the peoples trust...
    You were clear that you wanted changes to ensure that Lowry and Wallace couldn't get elected.

    Quote Originally Posted by bernadette View Post
    It may be that the best way to ensure that is to widen the net.
    What grounds are there for thinking that?

  5. #35
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    15,269

    Default Re: "I am extremely likely to cut the number of councillors and local authorities" Hogan / FG on local government changes

    Quote Originally Posted by MPB View Post
    Nonsense.

    Nobody is advocating engineering the electoral system to control who runs for election.

    I am advocating for an electoral system that insures a fairer way of electing our representitives.

    Nobody is advocating for preventing people running for election.
    Bernadette is.

    Quote Originally Posted by bernadette View Post
    The constitution needs to be tightened so that those proven like Wallace who incur huge debts or others who are proven to be dishonest cannot stand for election.
    Quote Originally Posted by MPB View Post
    What I am advocating is that these politicians cannot buy their election, even when they have been proven to have abused their position and acted in a corrupt manner.

    If we are not prepared to prevent people the judiciary believe to have been corrupt, from running for office, we have to create a system that makes it a true election, based on who the majority believe is the best candidate for the job.
    Bigger constituencies wouldn't prevent people buying elections, they'd just mean that a bigger purse was needed.

  6. #36
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    1,221

    Default Re: "I am extremely likely to cut the number of councillors and local authorities" Hogan / FG on local government changes

    Quote Originally Posted by Baron von Biffo View Post
    You were clear that you wanted changes to ensure that Lowry and Wallace couldn't get elected.

    Ideally all representatives should be above reproach larger constituencies would help to end the accusations of TDs buying votes.

    What grounds are there for thinking that?

    I think the wider the net the harder it would be to bribe the electorate.
    ]
    .....

  7. #37
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    15,269

    Default Re: "I am extremely likely to cut the number of councillors and local authorities" Hogan / FG on local government changes

    Quote Originally Posted by bernadette View Post
    Ideally all representatives should be above reproach larger constituencies would help to end the accusations of TDs buying votes.
    How would that work? American Senators have much larger constituencies than our TDs and they've even coined the phrase 'pork barrel' to refer to the sort of voter bribery you refer to.

    Quote Originally Posted by bernadette View Post
    I think the wider the net the harder it would be to bribe the electorate.
    Again, how do you see that working?

    PS, Check your PMs.

  8. #38
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    954

    Default Re: "I am extremely likely to cut the number of councillors and local authorities" Hogan / FG on local government changes

    Quote Originally Posted by Baron von Biffo View Post
    Bernadette is.





    Bigger constituencies wouldn't prevent people buying elections, they'd just mean that a bigger purse was needed.
    More bloody nonsense.

    Back your opinion up. Prove it. Defend your position.

    Stop spouting inane nonsense.

    I have put my beliefs out there to be critisized or defended.

    Where are yours? Do you have any? If you do, debate them.

  9. #39
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    1,221

    Default Re: "I am extremely likely to cut the number of councillors and local authorities" Hogan / FG on local government changes

    Quote Originally Posted by Baron von Biffo View Post
    How would that work? American Senators have much larger constituencies than our TDs and they've even coined the phrase 'pork barrel' to refer to the sort of voter bribery you refer to.



    Again, how do you see that working?

    PS, Check your PMs.

    I answered my PM! Check yours.

    This is not America and how we set a new system up would have to deal with the problem of pork barrel politicians. Its probably one of the hardest things to eradicate but it shouldn't be as blatant as it is here. We have too many TDs and not enough politicians. Go figure.

  10. #40
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    15,269

    Default Re: "I am extremely likely to cut the number of councillors and local authorities" Hogan / FG on local government changes

    Quote Originally Posted by MPB View Post
    More bloody nonsense.

    Back your opinion up. Prove it. Defend your position.

    Stop spouting inane nonsense.

    I have put my beliefs out there to be critisized or defended.

    Where are yours? Do you have any? If you do, debate them.
    Maybe you should only post when the sun is below the yardarm.

  11. #41
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    15,269

    Default Re: "I am extremely likely to cut the number of councillors and local authorities" Hogan / FG on local government changes

    Quote Originally Posted by bernadette View Post
    This is not America
    If I believed in Gods I'd thank them every hour for that.

    Quote Originally Posted by bernadette View Post
    how we set a new system up would have to deal with the problem of pork barrel politicians. Its probably one of the hardest things to eradicate but it shouldn't be as blatant as it is here. We have too many TDs and not enough politicians. Go figure.
    The point is that simply having larger constituencies wont eliminate the perceived problem of politicians pandering to populist demands.

  12. #42
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    954

    Default Re: "I am extremely likely to cut the number of councillors and local authorities" Hogan / FG on local government changes

    Quote Originally Posted by Baron von Biffo View Post
    Maybe you should only post when the sun is below the yardarm.
    The typical retort of a coward.

    I had you well pegged on P.ie as well. All p1ss and wind.

  13. #43
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    15,269

    Default Re: "I am extremely likely to cut the number of councillors and local authorities" Hogan / FG on local government changes

    Quote Originally Posted by MPB View Post
    The typical retort of a coward.

    I had you well pegged on P.ie as well. All p1ss and wind.

  14. #44
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Wash DC
    Posts
    4,495

    Default Re: "I am extremely likely to cut the number of councillors and local authorities" Hogan / FG on local government changes

    In my view, people who express their personal opinions and assumptions masquerading as a proven “fact” without explanation, have crossed the line from responsible posting into trolling, and there is evidence of that on this thread.

    It’s kinda like the blurring of the line between hard news reporting and opinion journalism. The best news outlets for ethical reasons. clearly distinguish between each, the others quickly fall into disrepute.
    As a general rule the most successful man in life is the man who has the best information. Benjamin Disraeli
    Secrecy is for losers. For people who do not know how important the information really is.
    Daniel Patrick Moynihan - Secrecy: The American Experience (1998)

  15. #45
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    1,221

    Default Re: "I am extremely likely to cut the number of councillors and local authorities" Hogan / FG on local government changes

    Quote Originally Posted by Count Bobulescu View Post
    In my view, people who express their personal opinions and assumptions masquerading as a proven “fact” without explanation, have crossed the line from responsible posting into trolling, and there is evidence of that on this thread.

    It’s kinda like the blurring of the line between hard news reporting and opinion journalism. The best news outlets for ethical reasons. clearly distinguish between each, the others quickly fall into disrepute.
    I don't understand. Surely its obvious that there are some less than honest TDs in the Dail and some free riders in the Seanad? We also have too many reps for our population and that makes pork barrel politics easier. The same on a smaller scale applies to the counties.

    Short of naming people its not possible to give facts but it is possible to give ones opinion on how to change it.

Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •