Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 34

Thread: Maskey To Stand Aside in South Belfast

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Granny Madden's
    Posts
    5,564

    Default Maskey To Stand Aside in South Belfast

    Sinn Féin election candidate in South Belfast, Alex Maskey has decided decided to withdraw from the Westminster poll to assist SDLP incumbent Alasdair McDonnell to retain the seat.

    http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politi...nd/8632730.stm

    Maskey has said the decision is to ensure a Nationalist victory in the constituency. It will now put pressure on the SDLP to reconsider its position in Fermanagh South Tyrone. Mind you, anyone who had the misfortune to witness Fearghal McKinney's woeful performance against Gerry Kelly on The Politics Show might wonder why someone so obviously clueless about the game is standing in the first place but that's just my take on it.

    So, is this the same sectarian head-count policy that the Unionists were condemned for last week and should the SDLP stoop to conquer in FST?

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    10,510

    Default Re: Maskey To Stand Aside in South Belfast

    Why don't the Shinners just merge with the stoops .... i can't really see what separates them at this stage...

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    1,584

    Default Re: Maskey To Stand Aside in South Belfast

    Quote Originally Posted by Sam Lord View Post
    Why don't the Shinners just merge with the stoops .... i can't really see what separates them at this stage...
    I've asked Shinners this question many times.
    The only difference they can identify is that "Sinn Fein is the only All Ireland Republican party" (which they're not of course).
    Ideologically there is no difference.
    National Question? No difference.
    Historical baggage is the main difference I would see. But thats history.
    I'm guessing, like all potential mergers, it a clash of egos.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Posts
    10,510

    Default Re: Maskey To Stand Aside in South Belfast

    Quote Originally Posted by truth.ie View Post
    I've asked Shinners this question many times.
    The only difference they can identify is that "Sinn Fein is the only All Ireland Republican party" (which they're not of course).
    Ideologically there is no difference.
    National Question? No difference.
    Historical baggage is the main difference I would see. But thats history.
    I'm guessing, like all potential mergers, it a clash of egos.
    The new entity could All Ireland. Why not?

    It could be called the All Ireland Social and Democratic Labour Party (Sinn Fein).

    Could even give them boost in the 26 from those who would never trust the Shinners on their own and consider them not long enough disinfected.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    in the teeth of adversity
    Posts
    2,629

    Default Re: Maskey To Stand Aside in South Belfast

    Quote Originally Posted by truth.ie View Post
    I've asked Shinners this question many times.
    The only difference they can identify is that "Sinn Fein is the only All Ireland Republican party" (which they're not of course).
    Ideologically there is no difference.
    National Question? No difference.
    Historical baggage is the main difference I would see. But thats history.
    I'm guessing, like all potential mergers, it a clash of egos.
    If they merge now, SF has to pay some kind of bride-price to the SDLP relics. Much better to wait a little while and pick up all the remaining Stoop electoral assets for free. That'd be my take on it.
    "It is we the workers who built these palaces and cities here in Spain and in America and everywhere. We, the workers, can build others to take their place. And better ones! We are not in the least afraid of ruins. We are going to inherit the earth; there is not the slightest doubt about that. The bourgeoisie might blast and ruin its own world before it leaves the stage of history. We carry a new world here, in our hearts."
    — Buenaventura Durruti

  6. #6

    Default Re: Maskey To Stand Aside in South Belfast

    So Sinn Fein are calling the SDLPs bluff in FST.
    If the SDLP dont withdraw will Shinners still vote for McDonnell in South Belfast?

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Wacky Races
    Posts
    1,949

    Default Re: Maskey To Stand Aside in South Belfast

    Quote Originally Posted by electionlit View Post
    So Sinn Fein are calling the SDLPs bluff in FST.
    If the SDLP dont withdraw will Shinners still vote for McDonnell in South Belfast?
    I don't think anyone is expecting SF voters to vote for the SDLP in South Belfast.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    2,620

    Default Re: Maskey To Stand Aside in South Belfast

    The stoops won't stand aside in FST, why should they? People will be surprised by the vote that McKinney gets.
    "Do not be misled by the promises of politicians. Remember that the whole history of Ireland is a record of betrayals by politicians and statesmen, and remembering this, spurn their lying promises and stand up for a United Ireland - an Ireland broad based upon the union of Labour and Nationality." - James Connolly.

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    your optic nerve
    Posts
    3,029

    Default Re: Maskey To Stand Aside in South Belfast

    Quote Originally Posted by mutley View Post
    I don't think anyone is expecting SF voters to vote for the SDLP in South Belfast.

    The only reason there is a stoop MP in south Belfast is because of SF votes.

    Do you honestly believe that SF only have 2500 odd votes in south Belfast ? Seriously ?

    If AMcD holds his seat it will be because of republican votes. No ifs no buts.

    The stoops and me Fein are pathetic compared to the republican/nationalist strategic voting in the constituency.

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    your optic nerve
    Posts
    3,029

    Default Re: Maskey To Stand Aside in South Belfast

    Quote Originally Posted by Cáthasaigh View Post
    The stoops won't stand aside in FST, why should they? People will be surprised by the vote that McKinney gets.
    McKinney is a tube. I'd rather vote Connor tbh.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    142

    Default Re: Maskey To Stand Aside in South Belfast

    Quote Originally Posted by moss View Post
    The only reason there is a stoop MP in south Belfast is because of SF votes.

    Do you honestly believe that SF only have 2500 odd votes in south Belfast ? Seriously ?

    If AMcD holds his seat it will be because of republican votes. No ifs no buts.

    The stoops and me Fein are pathetic compared to the republican/nationalist strategic voting in the constituency.
    Lower Ormeau & Markets is about the only areas of South Belfast which you could call SF turf.....

    I'd be very surprised to see alot of these areas even go out and vote SDLP come election day. I wouldn't be comfortable with a safe SDLP seat yet.

    DUP & UUP fighting a great election here. Paula Bradshaw working tirelessly in getting round everyone. She'll be hindered by being not known and actually from Jordanstown.

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    your optic nerve
    Posts
    3,029

    Default Re: Maskey To Stand Aside in South Belfast

    Quote Originally Posted by Pat De Baker View Post
    Lower Ormeau & Markets is about the only areas of South Belfast which you could call SF turf.....

    I'd be very surprised to see alot of these areas even go out and vote SDLP come election day. I wouldn't be comfortable with a safe SDLP seat yet.

    DUP & UUP fighting a great election here. Paula Bradshaw working tirelessly in getting round everyone. She'll be hindered by being not known and actually from Jordanstown.

    Pat that area has changed big time.
    SF have votes all the way up to Carryduff. Not massive amounts but growing. The writing is on the wall..........literally. As far as Forestside is now a nationalist ward.
    Sunnyside St ? Top of the Ravenhill ?

    I stand by the fact that AMcD only got his seat through tactical voting.
    Unionists use pacts. Nationalists use tactics.

    In no way am I saying that it's a safe SDLP seat but if they do hold it, it will be because of SF votes (and an apathetic unionist vote)

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    142

    Default Re: Maskey To Stand Aside in South Belfast

    Quote Originally Posted by moss View Post
    In no way am I saying that it's a safe SDLP seat but if they do hold it, it will be because of SF votes (and an apathetic unionist vote)

    Forgot about Boundary changes....

    But come on - I'm just afte talking to one of the biggest SF members in the Markets and he will give his vote to Lo. He'll be working North Belfast on the day getting the SF vote out.

    I cann't see McDonnell getting much of the SF vote. Alot of anger that they didn't work together on FST

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    your optic nerve
    Posts
    3,029

    Default Re: Maskey To Stand Aside in South Belfast

    Quote Originally Posted by Pat De Baker View Post
    Forgot about Boundary changes....

    But come on - I'm just afte talking to one of the biggest SF members in the Markets and he will give his vote to Lo. He'll be working North Belfast on the day getting the SF vote out.

    I cann't see McDonnell getting much of the SF vote. Alot of anger that they didn't work together on FST
    There's your mistake.

    You think a senior sinner will tell you he's voting stoop ? He'd rather stick pins in his eyes.

    The SDLP got in last time because of nudge nudge wink wink.
    No sinner admits to voting stoop.

    Tactical voting not honest voting. We've been at it for years.

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Wacky Races
    Posts
    1,949

    Default Re: Maskey To Stand Aside in South Belfast

    Quote Originally Posted by moss View Post
    There's your mistake.

    You think a senior sinner will tell you he's voting stoop ? He'd rather stick pins in his eyes.

    The SDLP got in last time because of nudge nudge wink wink.
    No sinner admits to voting stoop.

    Tactical voting not honest voting. We've been at it for years.
    Have you any proof of this is SB?

Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •