Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 26

Thread: Two 'Big Lies' so far from the Yes side in Treaty Debate

Hybrid View

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    15,508

    Default Two 'Big Lies' so far from the Yes side in Treaty Debate

    I know we have a few Referendum threads already and I don't want to clutter the place but two absolutely gigantic whoppers from Rabbitte and Martin deserve highlighting.
    These are not debating points; they are simply direct lies
    1. Pat Rabbitte on the The Week in Politcs on Sunday night:
    We have no veto on the ESM
    Completly untrue:

    The amendment to Article 136 can only enter into force
    when notifi cations of ratifi cation have been received from all
    EU Member States. If this is not the case before 1 January 2013,
    it will enter into force on the fi rst day of the month following the
    receipt of the last of the notifi cations.
    2. Michael Martin on the Vincent Browne debate this evening:
    ESM will lend to us at cost
    Completely untrue

    THE INSTRUMENTS OF FINANCIAL ASSISTANCE
    The ESM has been set up to provide fi nancial
    assistance, subject to strict conditionality, to euro
    area countries experiencing severe fi nancing
    diffi culties. As with the EFSF, this assistance
    will predominantly take the form of loans,
    known as ESM stability support (ESS). ESS will
    be conditional on agreement to and compliance
    with a strict macroeconomic adjustment
    programme. The maturity of the ESS loans will
    depend on the nature of the imbalances and the
    benefi ciary country’s prospects of regaining
    access to fi nancial markets. The interest rate on
    the loans, which may be either fi xed or variable,
    will be the sum of the funding cost to the
    ESM and a charge of 200 basis points.
    An additional surcharge of 100 basis points
    will be added for amounts still outstanding after
    three years. The pricing policy will be reviewed
    by the ESM Board of Governors on a regular
    basis
    .
    Source: The ECB: "The European Stability Mechanism"
    http://www.ecb.int/pub/pdf/other/art..._pp71-84en.pdf

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Dublin, Ireland
    Posts
    5,251

    Default Re: Two 'Big Lies' so far from the Yes side in Treaty Debate

    You should send this on to Vinnie B's twitter machine, post haste, Paddy Joe.
    "This isn't working,
    My middle-brow f**ker"

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    heart of Europe
    Posts
    11,395

    Default Re: Two 'Big Lies' so far from the Yes side in Treaty Debate

    Quote Originally Posted by Griska View Post
    You should send this on to Vinnie B's twitter machine, post haste, Paddy Joe.
    Seconded. Motion passed.

    Get on the Twitter machine PJ
    "The land Coillte Teo is now selling for development was given to them by the State in 1988 to ensure that our woodlands were run commercially, not to enable them to sell the family silver to service bank loans".
    - Friends of the Irish Environment, 28.04.2003

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    in the national interest
    Posts
    12,625

    Default Re: Two 'Big Lies' so far from the Yes side in Treaty Debate

    Paschal adamant on the lie just now.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    6,557

    Default Re: Two 'Big Lies' so far from the Yes side in Treaty Debate

    Somebody needs to tell Karl Whelan also his blog states -

    In contrast, loans from European facilities now carry no margin over the cost of funds.
    http://karlwhelan.com/blog/?p=386
    Thomas Jefferson : Banking Establishments are More Dangerous to our Liberties than Standing Armies.

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    15,508

    Default Re: Two 'Big Lies' so far from the Yes side in Treaty Debate

    Quote Originally Posted by ang View Post
    Somebody needs to tell Karl Whelan also his blog states -



    http://karlwhelan.com/blog/?p=386
    That seems to be correct for current funding according to a Dail answer from Noonan back in January.
    However, we seem to be paying a bewildering range of interest rates ranging from 2.75% to 4.72% on the various loans that make up the bail out
    The Euro Area Heads of State or Government (HOSG) agreed on 21 July 2011 to reduce the cost of the European Financial Stability Facility (EFSF) to lending rates equivalent to those of the Balance of Payments facility close to, without going below, the EFSF funding cost. In addition, further amendments to the EFSF framework have removed the interest rate margin on EFSF funds and were incorporated into a new legal agreement on the 27th of October in which the interest rate margin is now defined as zero. The agreement incorporates a guarantee commitment fee of 0.1% per annum and a service fee to cover the cost of operations of the EFSF.
    http://debates.oireachtas.ie/dail/2012/01/19/00078.asp

    Not applicable to the ESM though.

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    6,557

    Default Re: Two 'Big Lies' so far from the Yes side in Treaty Debate

    Quote Originally Posted by PaddyJoe View Post
    That seems to be correct for current funding according to a Dail answer from Noonan back in January.
    However, we seem to be paying a bewildering range of interest rates ranging from 2.75% to 4.72% on the various loans that make up the bail out

    http://debates.oireachtas.ie/dail/2012/01/19/00078.asp

    Not applicable to the ESM though.
    Yes I get that but it was made in reference to IMF funding if no to Fiscal compact implying we are better off with EU funding us.
    Thomas Jefferson : Banking Establishments are More Dangerous to our Liberties than Standing Armies.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Rockall
    Posts
    54,689

    Default Re: Two 'Big Lies' so far from the Yes side in Treaty Debate

    Quote Originally Posted by PaddyJoe View Post
    I know we have a few Referendum threads already and I don't want to clutter the place but two absolutely gigantic whoppers from Rabbitte and Martin deserve highlighting.
    These are not debating points; they are simply direct lies
    1. Pat Rabbitte on the The Week in Politcs on Sunday night:

    Completly untrue:



    2. Michael Martin on the Vincent Browne debate this evening:

    Completely untrue



    Source: The ECB: "The European Stability Mechanism"
    http://www.ecb.int/pub/pdf/other/art..._pp71-84en.pdf
    Ken Curtin thinks Martin will correct this.

    *holds breath with trepidation*

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Dublin, Ireland
    Posts
    5,251

    Default Re: Two 'Big Lies' so far from the Yes side in Treaty Debate

    Quote Originally Posted by C. Flower View Post
    Ken Curtin thinks Martin will correct this.

    *holds breath with trepidation*
    He may "correct" this, but it will be to a smaller audience, and the lie may have stuck with some.
    "This isn't working,
    My middle-brow f**ker"

  10. #10
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Rockall
    Posts
    54,689

    Default Re: Two 'Big Lies' so far from the Yes side in Treaty Debate

    Quote Originally Posted by Griska View Post
    He may "correct" this, but it will be to a smaller audience, and the lie may have stuck with some.
    People in Ireland distrust politicians.

  11. #11
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Dublin, Ireland
    Posts
    5,251

    Default Re: Two 'Big Lies' so far from the Yes side in Treaty Debate

    Quote Originally Posted by C. Flower View Post
    People in Ireland distrust politicians.
    True, and FF politicians in particular, but somebody watching the debate tonight hoping to hear something to sway their vote may well have picked up on Martin's comment.
    "This isn't working,
    My middle-brow f**ker"

  12. #12
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Rockall
    Posts
    54,689

    Default Re: Two 'Big Lies' so far from the Yes side in Treaty Debate

    Quote Originally Posted by Griska View Post
    True, and FF politicians in particular, but somebody watching the debate tonight hoping to hear something to sway their vote may well have picked up on Martin's comment.
    Martin and Mary Lou were sharper than Higgins and .... who was it...

    The Government is failing to sell the Treaty per se. It is all about consequences, and people will feel that is obfuscation, and become exasperated.

  13. #13
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    heart of Europe
    Posts
    11,395

    Default Re: Two 'Big Lies' so far from the Yes side in Treaty Debate

    Tweet machine coverage on VB

    Why was M. Martin the only leader?

    Why were Labour not represented? Why let FG speak for them?

    FG (or is it FF) and FF (or is it FG) are 2 peas in a pod

    No reference to a truth seeking PJ
    "The land Coillte Teo is now selling for development was given to them by the State in 1988 to ensure that our woodlands were run commercially, not to enable them to sell the family silver to service bank loans".
    - Friends of the Irish Environment, 28.04.2003

  14. #14
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Dublin, Ireland
    Posts
    5,251

    Default Re: Two 'Big Lies' so far from the Yes side in Treaty Debate

    Quote Originally Posted by DCon View Post
    Tweet machine coverage on VB

    Why was M. Martin the only leader?

    Why were Labour not represented? Why let FG speak for them?

    FG (or is it FF) and FF (or is it FG) are 2 peas in a pod

    No reference to a truth seeking PJ
    Our Truther has been silenced!
    "This isn't working,
    My middle-brow f**ker"

  15. #15
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Posts
    15,508

    Default Re: Two 'Big Lies' so far from the Yes side in Treaty Debate

    Quote Originally Posted by Griska View Post
    Our Truther has been silenced!
    Don't worry. There's be plenty of other fibs flying around for the next four weeks.
    The trick is to shoot them down as quick as possible to make way for the next ones...

Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast

Tags for this Thread

Bookmarks

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •