PDA

View Full Version : Timber Production: An Inconvenient Truth



Fraxinus
16-10-2011, 12:21 PM
I read a very interesting paper recently written in the journal of the Royal Scottish Forestry Society.

It was inspired after the last years protestations in Britain over the threat to sell off publicly owned forests. Now I would be against the privatisation of public resources as well myself but the author of the paper raises some relevant points.

Unlike forestry in southern Ireland, British forestry and that of the Six Counties is not an expanding industry and has to a large degree completely moved away from timber production. The result is that Britain imports large amounts of timber and this will substantially increase into the future.
According to the article forest management, at least publicly owned forests, has switched from timber production to forest recreation and conservation due to public pressure over the past 20 years. All essential and worthy but as the writer points out, managing woodlands for timber doesn't have to be exclusive of the other two objectives as European forestry has shown.

People use vast amounts of timber products every year and these timber products have to come from somewhere. In Britain, it seems, that people don't want timber products from domestic sources rather seeing their forests used exclusively for wildlife and recreation management while consuming imports from abroad.

I don't think it's a case for privatisation but the article definitely highlights the need for us to be aware that timber doesn't just fall from the sky and some form of production managment is needed. Seeing that it is a renewable resource it'd be very foolish for us not to use wood products either. And there are forms of management as promoted by the likes of http://www.prosilvaireland.org/ that are sustainable by including the protection of biodiversity in its management.

I don't have permission to attach the article yet but here's a link to a bullet point presentation on the subject by the author of the paper http://www.abdn.ac.uk/rural-law/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/1230-1250-Andrew-Cameron-The-Forestry-Sector.pdf

morticia
16-10-2011, 07:40 PM
I actually don't understand why at least some of the Scottish plantations aren't used for timber. Parts of the Highlands are so underpopulated they'd have 3 and a half visitors per year.

Typical Britain... everything HERE has to be picture perfect, but we don't care if we're busy despoiling everyone else's environment. There was some study out a few years ago; UK responsible for 2% of world emissions, but that goes up to 15% if you count UK industry abroad...and what about the wars???

Yeearrghh

Fraxinus
18-10-2011, 07:06 AM
I actually don't understand why at least some of the Scottish plantations aren't used for timber. Parts of the Highlands are so underpopulated they'd have 3 and a half visitors per year.

Typical Britain... everything HERE has to be picture perfect, but we don't care if we're busy despoiling everyone else's environment. There was some study out a few years ago; UK responsible for 2% of world emissions, but that goes up to 15% if you count UK industry abroad...and what about the wars???

Yeearrghh

It applies to resource use in general as well. Now timber is a renewable resource so depending on how much we use, the management of it can be done sustainably if mass wood consumption is curtailed.
Gas is a different story but a speaker at an anti-fracking meeting made a good point, as long as we continue to consume vast amounts of fossil fuels exploaration companies will keep going to greater lengths to extract them from the earth, and if they don't get their way drilling for it here then they will just get it from and pollute another part of the globe.

Britain is very foolish if it doesn't start using its forest for timber again. Low impact management can have very positive effects for biodiversity as even native woods when left long enough can turn into broadleaved monocultures with limited ground plants able to survive dense shading.

TotalMayhem
18-10-2011, 08:09 AM
I'm slightly worried about Bertie's "low impact management" and indeed his "very positive effects for biodiversity" once he has acquired the Irish forests for his masters at Helvetia Wealth Management.

Fraxinus
18-10-2011, 08:33 AM
I'm slightly worried about Bertie's "low impact management" and indeed his "very positive effects for biodiversity" once he has acquired the Irish forests for his masters at Helvetia Wealth Management.

Haha...well if by "low impact" ya mean light touch regulation and by "very positive effects for biodiversity" ya mean a great return for various investment funds, then yes...I can see Bertie adhering to those objectives.