PDA

View Full Version : Intellectual property theft litters history



reedak
04-03-2019, 08:07 AM
Chris Johns is an Irish Times contributor focusing on Brexit. The following are excerpts from his April 15, 2018 article headlined "China stealing from the US? Nothing new in pinching each otherís best ideas" with the subheading "Chris Johns: Trump may rail, but intellectual property theft litters history".

(Begin excerpts)
....Analysts are reaching back into economic history to point out that countries have been pinching each otherís technologies for a very long time. The economist Ed Conway reminds us that the current darling of both Broadway and Londonís West End, Alexander Hamilton, was a prime exponent of the dark arts of cheating, stealing data and technology from Britain to pass on to Americaís nascent industries.

John Cochrane, a leading US economist, also reminds us of history with reference to the American spies who stole the design of power looms from Britain; this, as much as anything, kick-started US manufacturing industry. American publishers regularly reprinted Charles Dickensís novels without paying the author. Intellectual-property chicanery is neither recent nor uniquely Chinese.

Ideas are different from physical capital, such as land, machinery and buildings. All represent the basic infrastructure of the economy, but the salient feature of an idea is that its marginal cost is zero: once the idea has been had it costs nothing to have it again.

Economics is very clear about things that cost nothing to reproduce: they should also cost nothing to buy. In principle things like new software programs should be disseminated as widely and at near zero price to anybody who wants them. Thatís the economic-efficiency argument that, if followed, maximises the benefits of the idea to society as a whole. Try telling that to Bill Gates.

China Ė and any other country or region interested in economic growth Ė is as entitled as any other to try its hand at economic development. For all of Trumpís Twitter criticisms of foreign competition, American GDP per head is still more than seven times Chinaís.

Critics who cry foul at intellectual-property theft via hacking or other forms of industrial espionage have a point. But many of the US companies that Donald Trump seems so keen to protect give their technology to the Chinese. Itís not stolen. Facebook and others choose to reveal their source code. Thatís their choice; they donít have to. And anybody is free to exploit it, not just China.

If nobody can sell an idea, of course, then there isnít much financial incentive for having one. Thatís why there is patent law and all the other efforts directed to erecting barriers to the free transmission of innovation. And those laws, in fact, seem to work rather well. Just ask any of the buyers Ė from anywhere, not just in the United States Ė of pharmaceuticals.

Those companies that freely give away a lot of their best ideas also seem to be doing rather well. If the US is being damaged by technology transfer itís not evident from the profitability of its companies. Those earnings have been on a roll: the companies that make up the S&P 500 index are expanding profits by 20 per cent or more. In fact, on current forecasts, American industry is forecast to grow earnings by another 30 per cent over the next 12 months. Anyone wondering about the effects of Trump tax cuts need look no further.

How big a problem is technology transfer? Cochrane sees it as a nonissue. His argument is perhaps even more interesting given that he is on the right of American politics. Free-market economists who follow their own logic can come up with radical-sounding answers. Cochrane sees only the efficiency gains that accrue to everybody from freely sharing stuff that costs nothing to produce. Everybody really does benefit. The only people who will gain from charging for things that should be free are firms already making monopoly-style profits. And everybody else loses.

Donald Trump seems determined to keep American ideas from crossing the border. The companies that he seeks to protect are just as determined to keep giving away much of their computer code for free. In a way thatís what Mark Zuckerbergís congressional testimony this week was all about: Facebook is not going to tear up its business model.... (End excerpts)

Source: https://www.irishtimes.com/business/economy/china-stealing-from-the-us-nothing-new-in-pinching-each-other-s-best-ideas-1.3462381